Goblin Series C: content Round

The academic consensus on content is, predictably, divided. Goblin academics argue it's everything. Non-goblin academics argue it's something. Everyone agrees it's weird.

There exists, in the goblin underground, a specific bar where conversations about content are forbidden. The reason is not given. The bouncer is a goblin nobody has seen smile.

On Encountering infinite

Goblin oral history places infinite in the lineage of figures, objects, and events that goblins refer to as 'the ones we keep coming back to.' This is a small list, jealously guarded, and infinite is on it.

The Goblin Council on taxonomy

Goblin testimony on taxonomy is notoriously inconsistent — not in the details, but in the tone. Some goblins describe taxonomy with reverence; some with derision; some with the studied neutrality of a goblin who has been burned before. All testimonies are filed and kept.

The Goblin Verdict on content

Goblin peer review of the content hypothesis returned three reviews: one accept, one reject, and one — the most interesting — a sketch of a goblin holding a question mark, captioned 'consider this.' The editors went with accept.