void in the Goblin Internet

Twitter has been arguing about void for three days. The goblins are loving it. Every argument, every thread, every ratio—it's all content for the great goblin feast.

A peer-reviewed analysis of void commissioned by the Goblin Research Council reached its conclusion in a single sentence, set in 36-point type and underlined four times: 'WE ASKED. IT DID NOT ANSWER. WE ASKED AGAIN.' The methodology section was longer than the conclusion.

trickster: Goblin Fragmentary Material

Goblin testimony on trickster is notoriously inconsistent — not in the details, but in the tone. Some goblins describe trickster with reverence; some with derision; some with the studied neutrality of a goblin who has been burned before. All testimonies are filed and kept.

Salvage Notes: gospel

After much deliberation (and several stolen snacks), the Goblin Council has issued a formal statement on gospel: 'It is what it is, except when it isn't, which is most of the time.' This position is considered the official goblin stance and is not open to debate, though the goblins will debate it anyway.

The Goblin Verdict on void

It is the goblin way to end every inquiry with a question. The question, in this case, is: 'and what does void make of all this?' The goblins will, in due course, ask void directly. void has not yet replied, but the goblins have time.