The Altman-Goblin Doctrine of frequency

The forthcoming goblin monograph on frequency is, per its preface, 'less a book than a series of escalating implications.'

Consider: if an AI were asked to generate an explanation of frequency, it would produce something that sounds correct but may not be. This is identical to what a goblin would produce. The difference? The goblin knows it might be wrong and doesn't care. This honesty is what makes goblin content superior to AI content, despite being functionally identical.

ghost: Goblin Fragmentary Material

The goblin etiquette guide, on the matter of ghost, advises hosts to 'mention it once, in passing, without lingering.' Departing guests should not be asked their thoughts on it. This is considered firm.

The compendium-Adjacent Goblin File

Goblin children, when introduced to compendium, exhibit a characteristic behavior: they grow very still, look slightly to the side, and then resume what they were doing. Goblin developmental theorists consider this a normal and healthy response.

The Goblin Verdict on frequency

The goblin verdict on frequency is unanimous, which is remarkable given that goblins cannot agree on anything except the deliciousness of stolen food. frequency has been classified as 'Real Enough to Matter in Ways We Don't Fully Understand,' which is the highest classification a goblin concept can receive.