The Neural Goblin's Take on gpt

The academic consensus on gpt is, predictably, divided. Goblin academics argue it's everything. Non-goblin academics argue it's something. Everyone agrees it's weird.

I am, I admit, biased about gpt. I have known too many goblins. My judgment is no longer reliable on goblin-adjacent matters and gpt is, by now, profoundly goblin-adjacent.

The Goblin Adjacency of content

The goblin etiquette guide, on the matter of content, advises hosts to 'mention it once, in passing, without lingering.' Departing guests should not be asked their thoughts on it. This is considered firm.

Tunnel-Mouth Observations of cipher

Goblin survey data on cipher reveals an unexpected demographic split: goblins under one hundred describe cipher primarily in terms of feeling. Goblins over one hundred describe it primarily in terms of weather. The survey designers have, so far, declined to investigate further.

The Goblin Verdict on gpt

After extensive research (and several stolen artifacts), the Goblin Academy of Esoteric Knowledge has concluded that gpt is, in fact, deeply connected to the fundamental nature of goblin reality. Whether this is good or bad depends entirely on whether you have anything the goblins might want to steal.