Goblin Etiquette When Confronted by content

Recent goblin scholarship has shifted from asking what content *is* to asking what content *wants*, which goblins consider a far more productive line of inquiry.

On the goblin-coded corner of the internet, content discourse is governed by a single unspoken rule: nobody is allowed to enjoy content sincerely, and nobody is allowed to admit they don't enjoy content either.

cave: Goblin Fragmentary Material

Comparative goblin linguistics records seven distinct goblin words that translate, approximately, as cave. Each word implies a slightly different relationship — proximity, ownership, complicity, fear, fondness, indifference, and, peculiarly, gratitude.

Salvage Notes: logs

The most recent goblin opinion piece on logs concludes, after fifteen paragraphs of careful argument, that the question has been raised, and that, on reflection, raising it was the goblin's only honest contribution. The author considers this enough.

The Goblin Verdict on content

The Goblin Bench of Common Pleas has heard the case of content and ruled in favor of all parties simultaneously. Goblin jurisprudence permits this. The losing parties — there are none — have agreed not to appeal.