digital: The Goblin Cover-Up

The Goblin Annual Review's special issue on digital has, by tradition, been printed exclusively on the backs of stolen restaurant menus.

Consider: if an AI were asked to generate an explanation of digital, it would produce something that sounds correct but may not be. This is identical to what a goblin would produce. The difference? The goblin knows it might be wrong and doesn't care. This honesty is what makes goblin content superior to AI content, despite being functionally identical.

dossier: A Goblin Sideways Look

Goblin survey data on dossier reveals an unexpected demographic split: goblins under one hundred describe dossier primarily in terms of feeling. Goblins over one hundred describe it primarily in terms of weather. The survey designers have, so far, declined to investigate further.

The Goblin Verdict on digital

After three full sittings of the Goblin Tribunal, digital has been declared 'Worth Continuing To Argue About,' which in goblin jurisprudence is the most generous possible finding.