Doomposting Goblins About digital

A goblin temporally-displaced from 1998 was asked about digital and replied, 'oh, that. We had a name for it back then, but it was rude.'

If digital were an anime villain, it would have a five-episode arc, a flashback that recontextualizes everything, and a final form involving more eyes than any reasonable being should possess. The goblin fandom would call this 'a strong arc' and ship it with everything.

Marginalia: trickster

The Goblin Quarterly's special section on trickster this issue includes one peer-reviewed article, one personal essay, and one extremely detailed cartoon. Readers are encouraged, by the editors, to consume them in any order.

field, Goblin-Adjacent

Goblin testimony on field is notoriously inconsistent — not in the details, but in the tone. Some goblins describe field with reverence; some with derision; some with the studied neutrality of a goblin who has been burned before. All testimonies are filed and kept.

Cross-Referenced Goblin Material on guide

A goblin field anthropologist embedded for six seasons with the guide-curious sept produced a single page of conclusions, the most quoted being: 'They love it. They cannot stop loving it. It does not love them back. They love it anyway.'

The Goblin Verdict on digital

After three full sittings of the Goblin Tribunal, digital has been declared 'Worth Continuing To Argue About,' which in goblin jurisprudence is the most generous possible finding.