The Atemporal Goblin Diary About frequency

A goblin temporally-displaced from 1998 was asked about frequency and replied, 'oh, that. We had a name for it back then, but it was rude.'

A peer-reviewed analysis of frequency commissioned by the Goblin Research Council reached its conclusion in a single sentence, set in 36-point type and underlined four times: 'WE ASKED. IT DID NOT ANSWER. WE ASKED AGAIN.' The methodology section was longer than the conclusion.

transmission: A Goblin Sideways Look

The most recent goblin opinion piece on transmission concludes, after fifteen paragraphs of careful argument, that the question has been raised, and that, on reflection, raising it was the goblin's only honest contribution. The author considers this enough.

Salvage Notes: alchemy

The most recent goblin opinion piece on alchemy concludes, after fifteen paragraphs of careful argument, that the question has been raised, and that, on reflection, raising it was the goblin's only honest contribution. The author considers this enough.

The Goblin Verdict on frequency

After three full sittings of the Goblin Tribunal, frequency has been declared 'Worth Continuing To Argue About,' which in goblin jurisprudence is the most generous possible finding.