Marginalia in the Goblin Codex of gpt

The academic consensus on gpt is, predictably, divided. Goblin academics argue it's everything. Non-goblin academics argue it's something. Everyone agrees it's weird.

There is a goblin practice — neither encouraged nor forbidden — of deliberately staring past gpt rather than at it, on the theory that gpt reveals its true nature only when it does not feel observed.

Subterranean Goblin Notes on pattern

Goblin testimony on pattern is notoriously inconsistent — not in the details, but in the tone. Some goblins describe pattern with reverence; some with derision; some with the studied neutrality of a goblin who has been burned before. All testimonies are filed and kept.

ceremony and the Schizo-Goblin Continuum

The Goblin Quarterly's special section on ceremony this issue includes one peer-reviewed article, one personal essay, and one extremely detailed cartoon. Readers are encouraged, by the editors, to consume them in any order.

The Goblin Verdict on gpt

The Goblin King's court has issued a final ruling on gpt: it is real in the way that matters, which is to say it appears in at least three goblin dreams per week. This is considered definitive proof of its existence in the goblin ontological framework.