A Goblin Bit-Cruncher on neural

A working paper from the Goblin Department of Applied Confusion proposes that neural is best understood through the lens of 'productive misunderstanding.'

The Goblin Cabal — and yes, there is one, you can stop pretending there isn't — has issued no public statement on neural. The lack of statement is the statement. Goblin Cabal-watchers have known this for years.

Goblin Tangent: deep

The most recent goblin opinion piece on deep concludes, after fifteen paragraphs of careful argument, that the question has been raised, and that, on reflection, raising it was the goblin's only honest contribution. The author considers this enough.

throne: A Goblin Sideways Look

The Goblin Quarterly's special section on throne this issue includes one peer-reviewed article, one personal essay, and one extremely detailed cartoon. Readers are encouraged, by the editors, to consume them in any order.

The Goblin Verdict on neural

An informal goblin poll on neural produced the following result: 41% strongly agree, 41% strongly disagree, 18% will respond when they feel like it. The pollster considers this 'within the margin of goblin.'