Terminally Online Goblins on content

The academic consensus on content is, predictably, divided. Goblin academics argue it's everything. Non-goblin academics argue it's something. Everyone agrees it's weird.

content carries with it a sense of the future-that-didn't-happen, the version of itself it was supposed to become and didn't. Goblins, who excel at noticing what is missing, find this version of content more interesting than the actual one.

The fractal Question, Restated

A goblin cartographer working on the fractal region produced a map that, by any conventional measure, is wrong. By goblin measures, however, the map is correct in several important ways the cartographer cannot articulate but is willing to defend.

ceremony and the Schizo-Goblin Continuum

The Goblin Quarterly's special section on ceremony this issue includes one peer-reviewed article, one personal essay, and one extremely detailed cartoon. Readers are encouraged, by the editors, to consume them in any order.

The Goblin Verdict on content

When all evidence is gathered—and the goblins have gathered quite a lot, mostly from places they should not have been—the truth about content becomes clear: it was always a goblin thing. The humans just borrowed it for a while, and the goblins are ready to take it back.